Poor diet. No exercise. Smoking. Insomnia. We know these things are harmful. Yet, despite decades of research confirming damage to human health, environmental toxins have not made this list. Not for most Americans in everyday life.
How many times in a day do we expose ourselves to toxicity? Constantly.
Do patients with dementia or cancer or diabetes understand which environmental toxins contributed to their disease? Usually not.
Can we create safe environments when we don’t understand the causes of illness? No, how could we?
Are the environments our infants are born into toxic? Yes, very.
Are environmental toxicants changing the human species? Yes, but we don’t talk about it.
By strict definition, ‘toxins’ are naturally occurring elements such as pathogens, fungus/mold, radon, geopathic stress, poisonous plants, animals, minerals.
‘Toxicants’ are man-made elements: heavy metals and chemicals, plastics and nanoparticles, radiation and electro-pollutants. Toxicants are ubiquitous in cosmetics, household cleaners, processed and fresh foods, coatings on food containers, synthetics in clothing, beds, couches, and carpets, cell phones, computers, and “smart” devices in homes, hospitals, and offices, including in personal equipment such as wearables for monitoring health. Even baby monitors.
Human life on planet Earth in the 21st century is a daily swim through toxicants that are known to be harmful to human biology and function. Modern societies have heavier burdens of toxicants, yet no place is completely free of harm. Now that satellite-based wireless technologies, pharmaceuticals, and processed foods have reached most corners of the globe, even largely indigenous societies are affected.
When not properly understood, environmental toxins and toxicants affect more than acute and chronic disease. They eventually impact the functioning of family and society. Then economics, politics, and culture.
So, how are we dealing with toxicity in America? How do we pull together all that we know and eliminate or lessen the harm? We have made some progress with finding non-toxic alternatives, yet too many Americans still live embedded in toxic environments. Despite, ironically, some of the most strident environmental regulations on the planet.
The quest of science is to determine the impacts of toxicity. The purpose of medicine is to heal from the damages. The responsibility of government is to protect the public from harm. But the goal of the private sector is to make a profit on the goods and services that consumers desire.
What if science and the media get even louder about this issue? What if medicine - let’s say your primary care physician or pediatrician - explains how toxicants contribute to disease? What if they provide a list of common household toxicants? What if government has a game plan to detach itself from lobbyists and the power of the purse? What if enough consumers buy ‘clean’ and ‘non-toxic’ goods and services and we shift industry’s use of toxicants?
When science, medicine, government, and industry operate without an integrated vision for how to enhance health and reduce harm, too many products of industry work against us rather than for us. Without wellness as an agreed upon goal of society and in all academic disciplines, we live at the mercy of what we ourselves create.
Toxicity is a large topic. Future posts will continue to examine this issue: 1) how deeply America has allowed herself to walk into toxicity and how such an advanced country could do so, 2) why mainstream medicine has remained so silent on the problem of toxicity, and how it has historically contributed its own share of harm, 3) how we can change the impact of toxicity on chronic disease, and 4) what happens if we don’t.
Yes, toxic materials are indeed proliferating in our environment, and have been for at least 200 years. One thinks about the poor children exposed to lead from water pipes and paint, or even worse, working on bleak hills to sort and wash the lead ore coming from the mines, or breathing in soot from cleaning chimneys. Or the little match girls exposed to phosphorous .
Or just kids like me born in the 1950's in urban Britain, living in dense smogs of part-burned petrochemicals from coal burning, and breathing in lead from petrol fumes.
What's the good news? Well, life expectancy has doubled since 1945, so we aren't dying at those high rates. Clean air acts, control of water and food quality, lots of positives.
hey, we even get a bath more than once a week, and don't have to share the filthy bathwater with our older siblings or dad!
What's the bed news? A massive increase in Autism, for reasons that we can only speculate about.
If there was a proven link to a specific toxin, we would have found it by now.
And an horrific increase in obesity.
Plenty of challenges ahead, but keeping an open mind, and ensuring that science is unbiased by commercial interests, are the best means of improvement.
life expectancy has increased but as a nurse, my personal observation is that a more accurate description is we are dying longer. Lifespan interests me less than Healthspan, which is something that is often not part of the conversation in medicine/healthcare